Oracle blogger “kgee” wrote the following at https://blogs.oracle.com/hardware/entry/2_ways_ibm_has_over.
“Two Ways IBM Has Over-promised and Under-delivered with POWER8 to Date”. “Kgee” goes on to say the the following in which I provide the highlights.
- Power8 is More than a Year late.
- Where is AIX8?
- Fact: AIX 7 TL3 last November just released “WPAR alt_disk ….”
- Fact: Apparently per IBM’s roadmaps, AIX does not yet support SR-IOV
- Fact: Consider all of the advantages Oracle just released in Solaris 11.2
Just because you can say it, doesn’t make it true. This Oracle blog is full of wrong statements, mis-statements and “so what”.
1) IBM (imo) releases products when the market is ready for them. Products may be pulled or pushed as the market and competition require it. Also, SPARC & Solaris are no longer considered significant competition much to the chagrin of Larry who thinks Oracle should be the most relevant.
2) Is that all you have to criticize Power8 for? I’ll take it! Let me know when you want me to publish the side by side comparison of Power vs SPARC delivery dates. Oracle bought Sun so you own their dates as well!
3) Marketing drives model names for hardware and OS. Remember Solaris 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 then 2.7 – I mean Solaris 7? Then Solaris 8, 9, 10 and 11? Constant major OS re-numbering require ISV’s to re-certify which is costly and often slow. I applaud IBM for sticking with the current OS strategy that standardizes on the current two OSes in a effort to eliminate the disruption. Customers can now do minor updates for feature & bug enhancements to get to the next server generation without being required to do a major OS upgrade.
4) The author ‘kgee’ seems to have all of the AIX facts so he/she can tell us if AIX8 is late? I do not think it is and I am not expecting one but I wasn’t expecting one so not sure how it can be late. That said, AIX delivers more concurrent, dynamic, scalable, and secure features than Solaris. AIX is also integrated with the hypervisor and hardware for performance, security, serviceability and reliability. Can’t say that with Solaris, much of its RAS features are in the OS. To do it in the hardware requires significant engineering effort which IBM has in spades.
5) For your WPAR Alt_disk…. comment – congrats! You picked a OS virtualization feature to give the impression AIX is lacking or playing catch-up. Solaris only had Zones, which is a OS virtualization feature as an option for years with no hardware level virtualization offering or capability. Power has delivered PowerVM years before Solaris’s OS only option. AIX added WPAR’s with Solaris 6 which was available in 2007 – just 2 years after Solaris. As far as the “Alt_disk” vs Live Upgrade. AIX has had that feature since 2001. Guess that puts Solaris behind by 4 years.
6) Unified Archives – Oh great, another new feature from Oracle. Just like the T series, what is that 5 generations of servers in 6 or 7 years? Congrats on a new feature. I’ll take investment protection and stability.
7) No compromise virtualization with Solaris Zones – ha, really. Read your documentation. If you say “No compromise” that means none, nada, nothing yet you say in the definition “an even greater …” inferring an improvement. How can that be if it is already “No compromise”?
8) Power, PowerVM and AIX have delivered Quality of Service for cpu, ram, I/O for years. Congrats for catching up and using the latest buzzword “Software Defined”.
9) While Oracle works to lower the compliance effort with their offering, Power and PowerVM eliminate the effort of meeting compliance with IBM i and AIX through the use of PowerSC.
10) (Note: I forgot to add this in my original response to “Kgee’s” blog. Power servers have offered SR-IOV capabilities starting in October 2012 with Power7+ 770 & 780 servers. However, for all of the neat benefits of SR-IOV, those features are mutually exclusive to features long available in the Virtual I/O Server (VIOS). So, while Solaris was needing SR-IOV to get these features, IBM has been delivering this kind of functionality since 2004 with Power5.
Other than these 9 (now 10) items I thought your article was pretty good. Look forward to the next one.”
Solaris is a very good OS, just like HP-UX and other Unix OSes. AIX has enterprise features that in my opinion offer customers more features and benefits. It is a bit of Ford & Chevy. However, where there is no comparison is between Power servers vs SPARC servers. Even though Oracle delivers SPARC products, even new products they are years behind in functionality, capability, security, flexibility and performance compared to Power. At the end of the day – actually at the start of the day, customers want their servers available, secure, using as much of the resources as needed for as many workloads as possible keeping the real costs under control which is with software like Oracle database. Power controls these products while SPARC and x86 for that matter are meant to deliver a software license delivery vehicle to increase licenses for Oracles profit. Nothing wrong with profit but let’s call a spade a spade. TCO of Power will always beat the TCO of SPARC (and x86) for these kinds of workloads!